<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
		<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='http://www.kmklaw.com/rss.xsl?1328911436'?>
		<rss version='2.0' 
			xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
			xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
		<channel>
			<title>Corporate &amp; Securities Blog</title>     
			<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/</link>
			<atom:link href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
			<description></description>
			
			<item>
				<title>ISS Announces GRId 2.0 and Publishes 2012 Pay-for-Performance Whitepaper</title>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/ISS_Announces_GRId_2</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/186</guid>
				<dc:creator>F. Mark  Reuter</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bryan A. Jacobs</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>Institutional Investor Services (ISS) recently announced that it will be launching GRId 2.0 on February 20, 2012. &nbsp;GRId, or Governance Risk Indicators, is ISS’s rating system for publicly-traded companies’ corporate governance practices which ISS&nbsp; wants us to believe is designed to measure publicly-traded companies’ governance-related risk.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/ISS_Announces_GRId_2'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,corporate-governance'>Corporate Governance</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>S.E.C. Will Not Appeal Decision on Mandatory Proxy Access; Proxy Access on a Company-by-Company Basis Still a Possibility</title>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-Mandatory-Proxy-Access</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/185</guid>
				<dc:creator>Bryan A. Jacobs</dc:creator><dc:creator>F. Mark  Reuter</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p align="justify">On September 6, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission released a statement that it would not seek rehearing of the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit in the case captioned <em>Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce vs. Securities and Exchange Commission</em> or seek review of the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision vacated new proxy access Rule 14a-11, which would have required companies to include shareholders' director nominees in company proxy materials under certain circumstances.</p>
<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-Mandatory-Proxy-Access'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,securities-law'>Securities Law</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>D.C. Circuit Vacates Stayed Proxy Access Rule</title>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/DC-Circuit-Vacates-Stayed-Proxy</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/180</guid>
				<dc:creator>F. Mark  Reuter</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bryan A. Jacobs</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>On July 22, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed down a decision in the case captioned <em>Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce vs. Securities and Exchange Commission</em>, which vacates new proxy access Rule 14a-11, and related amendments to Rule 14a-8 on shareholder proposals.</p>
<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/DC-Circuit-Vacates-Stayed-Proxy'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,corporate-law'>Corporate Law</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,Rule-14a-11'>Rule 14a-11</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,Rule-14a-8'>Rule 14a-8</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,securities-law'>Securities Law</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>IRS Issues Proposed Regulations Under Code Section 162(m)</title>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/IRS-Regulations-Code-Section162m</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/179</guid>
				<dc:creator>Mark E. Sims</dc:creator><dc:creator>Laura H. Cox</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>Code Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the &quot;Code&quot;) precludes a tax deduction for remuneration paid to certain employees of publicly held companies in excess of $1,000,000.&nbsp; On June 23, 2011 the IRS issued proposed regulations under Code Section 162(m) to clarify two provisions of existing treasury regulations.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/IRS-Regulations-Code-Section162m'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,Code-Section-162m'>Code Section 162(m)</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,IRS'>IRS</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,Performance-Based-Compensation'>Performance-Based Compensation</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,Public-Company-Transition-Rules'>Public Company Transition Rules</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>SEC Adopts Final Rules on Whistleblower Incentives and Protection</title>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-Adopts-Final-Rules</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/174</guid>
				<dc:creator>F. Mark  Reuter</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bryan A. Jacobs</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>On May 25, 2011, over a month after its scheduled release date, the SEC adopted rules to implement Section 21F of the Exchange Act, &quot;Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection,&quot; which was added by Section 922 of Dodd-Frank.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-Adopts-Final-Rules'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,corporate-law'>Corporate Law</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,securities-law'>Securities Law</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>SEC Proposes Revised Accredited Investor Definition</title>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-revised-accredited-investor-definition</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/160</guid>
				<dc:creator>F. Mark  Reuter</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bryan A. Jacobs</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>The SEC recently proposed rules to revise its definition of &quot;Accredited Investor&quot; so that it mirrors the definition adopted by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Under the proposed rules, a person is no longer permitted to include the value of his or her primary residence in determining whether they meet the $1 million net worth requirement for an Accredited Investor. The proposed rules do not define &quot;primary residence,&quot; but do say that, for the most part, the common meaning of &quot;the home where a person lives most of the time&quot; should be used, whereas, in complex cases, the federal income tax rules should be consulted for guidance.</p>
<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-revised-accredited-investor-definition'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,securities-law'>Securities Law</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Securities and Exchange Commission Adopts Say-on-Pay</title>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-Adopts-Say-on-Pay</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/159</guid>
				<dc:creator>F. Mark  Reuter</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>On January 25, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (&quot;SEC&quot;) adopted final &quot;Shareholder Approval of Executive Compensation and Golden Parachute Compensation&quot; rules, which are effective for annual meetings of shareholders conducted on or after January 21, 2011. Also known as &quot;Say-on-Pay,&quot; the final rules address three separate shareholder votes mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and several proxy disclosures surrounding these votes. <a title="" href="http://www.kmklaw.com/news-publications-169.html">Click here for our firm's complete advisory</a>.</p>

<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-Adopts-Say-on-Pay'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,securities-law'>Securities Law</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>FASB Revises Timeline for Adoption of New Exposure Draft on Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies</title>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/FASB-revises-timeline-for-adoption</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/145</guid>
				<dc:creator>F. Mark  Reuter</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bryan A. Jacobs</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p align="left">On October 27, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board met to further discuss the timeline for adoption of its Exposure Draft of a proposed Statement, Contingencies (Topic 450), Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies.&nbsp; For an overview of this Exposure Draft and the events leading up to its issuance, please see our <a title="" href="http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/fasb-issues-new-exposure-draft">previous blog</a> on this subject.</p>
<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/FASB-revises-timeline-for-adoption'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,corporate-law'>Corporate Law</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,securities-law'>Securities Law</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>SEC Releases Proposed Rules on Say-on-Pay, Say-on-Frequency and Say-on-Parachutes</title>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-releases-proposed-rules</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/143</guid>
				<dc:creator>F. Mark  Reuter</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bryan A. Jacobs</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>On October 18, 2010, the SEC released proposed rules on &quot;Shareholder Approval of Executive Compensation and Golden Parachute Compensation&quot; which address three separate shareholder votes mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act for annual meetings of shareholders conducted on or after January 21, 2011.</p>
<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/SEC-releases-proposed-rules'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,corporate-law'>Corporate Law</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,securities-law'>Securities Law</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Proxy Access on Hold - For Now</title>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/proxy-access-on-hold</link>
				<guid>http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/138</guid>
				<dc:creator>F. Mark  Reuter</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bryan A. Jacobs</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>Yesterday, the SEC decided to stay the effectiveness of the proxy access rules pending resolution of a petition for review filed in connection with <a title="" href="http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/proxy-access-rules-lawsuit-filed">this lawsuit</a> filed by the Business Rountable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce.&nbsp; As a result, proxy access will not take effect in 2010 and its potential applicability to the 2011 proxy season is in limbo.</p>
<p><a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/proxy-access-on-hold'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,corporate-law'>Corporate Law</a>, <a href='http://corporate-securities.kmklaw.com/topic,securities-law'>Securities Law</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item><div id='historyLinks'><a class='first' href='?page=2'>Older Posts</a></div>
		</channel>
		</rss>
		
