SEC Proposes Revised Accredited Investor Definition
The SEC recently proposed rules to revise its definition of "Accredited Investor" so that it mirrors the definition adopted by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Under the proposed rules, a person is no longer permitted to include the value of his or her primary residence in determining whether they meet the $1 million net worth requirement for an Accredited Investor. The proposed rules do not define "primary residence," but do say that, for the most part, the common meaning of "the home where a person lives most of the time" should be used, whereas, in complex cases, the federal income tax rules should be consulted for guidance.
The proposal is seeking comments on issues such as whether the value of the residence should exclude debt secured by it (as proposed) or should be based solely on fair market value; whether the rule should include a definition of the term "primary residence," if so, what it should be; whether the net worth calculation should be made on a specified date to prevent end-arounds by investors; and whether investors who are no longer Accredited Investors as a result of Dodd-Frank should still be able to make add-on investments.
The proposed rules are just the beginning because Dodd-Frank eventually requires the SEC to review the Accredited Investor definition "in its entirety" and make any revisions that it deems appropriate.
Topics
- Rule 14a-11
- Rule 14a-8
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Performance-Based Compensation
- IRS
- Code Section 162(m)
- Corporate Law
- Proxy Access Rules
- Wall Street Reform
- Executive Compensation
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Tax Credit
- Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Health Care Act
- Corporate Tax
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Securities Law
- NYSE Rule 452
Contributors
Subscribe to RSS
Recent Posts
- ISS Announces GRId 2.0 and Publishes 2012 Pay-for-Performance Whitepaper
- S.E.C. Will Not Appeal Decision on Mandatory Proxy Access; Proxy Access on a Company-by-Company Basis Still a Possibility
- D.C. Circuit Vacates Stayed Proxy Access Rule
- IRS Issues Proposed Regulations Under Code Section 162(m)
- SEC Adopts Final Rules on Whistleblower Incentives and Protection
- Securities and Exchange Commission Adopts Say-on-Pay
- FASB Revises Timeline for Adoption of New Exposure Draft on Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies
- SEC Releases Proposed Rules on Say-on-Pay, Say-on-Frequency and Say-on-Parachutes
- Proxy Access on Hold - For Now
Other KMK Blogs
- Complex Litigation
- Electronic Discovery Road Map
- Management Rights
- Real Estate Blog
- The Cutting Edge of IP
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless we have specifically stated to the contrary in writing, any discussion of federal tax issues or submissions in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the United States federal tax laws or (2) promoting, marketing, or recommending to anyone any transaction or matter addressed herein.

