ISS Announces GRId 2.0 and Publishes 2012 Pay-for-Performance Whitepaper
Institutional Investor Services (ISS) recently announced that it will be launching GRId 2.0 on February 20, 2012. GRId, or Governance Risk Indicators, is ISS’s rating system for publicly-traded companies’ corporate governance practices which ISS wants us to believe is designed to measure publicly-traded companies’ governance-related risk. GRId purports to be based upon ISS’s proxy voting policy guidelines.
Certain features of GRId will stay the same. ISS will continue to evaluate in the four categories of Audit, Board, Compensation and Shareholder Rights in metrics of “Low Concern,” “Medium Concern” and “High Concern.” However, ISS uses GRId 2.0 as an opportunity to change its scoring methodology. ISS is adding new questions on its pay-for-performance methodology based on its newly-published whitepaper, related-party transactions, board relationships and takeover defenses. Companies should expect to receive a numerical GRId score for each of the categories in addition to a level of concern.
ISS’s Pay-for-Performance Whitepaper outlines ISS’s latest approach effective February 1, 2012, to evaluating pay-for-performance. This is the primary method ISS uses in deciding whether to recommend for or against a company’s say-on-pay vote and for or against a proposal related to an equity compensation plan. The latest approach is based upon the alignment between CEO pay and one and three year total shareholder return (“TSR”) within a subject company’s peer group (as designated by ISS, not the company) and between CEO pay and five year TSR of the subject company.
If you have any questions about how GRId 2.0 will affect your company’s corporate governance rating or about ISS’s Pay-for-Performance methodology, please contact us.
This blog post was updated on December 21, 2011
Topics
- Rule 14a-11
- Rule 14a-8
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Performance-Based Compensation
- IRS
- Code Section 162(m)
- Corporate Law
- Proxy Access Rules
- Wall Street Reform
- Executive Compensation
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Tax Credit
- Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Health Care Act
- Corporate Tax
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Securities Law
- NYSE Rule 452
Contributors
Subscribe to RSS
Recent Posts
- S.E.C. Will Not Appeal Decision on Mandatory Proxy Access; Proxy Access on a Company-by-Company Basis Still a Possibility
- D.C. Circuit Vacates Stayed Proxy Access Rule
- IRS Issues Proposed Regulations Under Code Section 162(m)
- SEC Adopts Final Rules on Whistleblower Incentives and Protection
- SEC Proposes Revised Accredited Investor Definition
- Securities and Exchange Commission Adopts Say-on-Pay
- FASB Revises Timeline for Adoption of New Exposure Draft on Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies
- SEC Releases Proposed Rules on Say-on-Pay, Say-on-Frequency and Say-on-Parachutes
- Proxy Access on Hold - For Now
Other KMK Blogs
- Complex Litigation
- Electronic Discovery Road Map
- Management Rights
- Real Estate Blog
- The Cutting Edge of IP
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Unless we have specifically stated to the contrary in writing, any discussion of federal tax issues or submissions in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the United States federal tax laws or (2) promoting, marketing, or recommending to anyone any transaction or matter addressed herein.

